• Institution
    • Leitung
    • Gremien
      • Wissenschaftlicher Beirat
        • Gesamtliste seit 1981
      • Stiftungsrat
      • Mitgliederversammlung
    • Ansprechpartner
    • Das Kolleg
      • Historie
        • Geschichte der Institution
          • Kurze Geschichte des Kollegs
        • Geschichte der Häuser und Gärten
          • Hauptgebäude
            • Exkurs - Der Garten
          • Weiße Villa
          • Neubau
          • Villa Jaffé
          • Villa Walther
        • Geschichte des Signets
      • Finanzierung & Satzungen
        • Satzung der Wissenschaftsstiftung
        • Satzung des Wissenschaftskollegs
      • Förderer & Freundeskreis
    • Initiativen & Kooperationen
      • Working Futures
        • Interviews
          • Gabriel Abend
          • Ève Chiapello
          • Elena Esposito
          • Michel Lallement
          • Sophie Bernard
          • David Stark
          • Richard Swedberg
        • Publications
          • Shifting Categories
          • Wiko Briefs - Working Futures in Corona Times
            • The digital transformation of work. COVID-19 as a taste of things to come?
            • Thinking the Global Rise of Forced Labor: Old, New, and Changing Forms of Labor Exploitation in Times of Crisis
            • Rearticulating globalization, solidarities, and work in Ethiopia
            • The future of shopping - Corona as a catalyst for the transformation of work
            • The End of the Pandemic of Productivism?
            • Covid and Looking for the Exit
            • Who or what is being tested in pandemic times?
            • The Crisis as Beginning of a New Relationship to the Professional World?
            • Controlled Avalanche – A Regulated Voluntary Exposure Approach for Addressing Covid-19
            • Caring about what we hold dear and the final purposes of work
            • How does the Corona crisis affect the future of work and our view of it?
            • "Useful", "indispensable", “essential”: Is the health crisis changing the categories with which we consider professional activities?
            • The Corona Crisis Reveals the Struggle for a Sustainable Digital Future
            • The Need for De-Integration in Pandemic Times
            • The COVID 19 crisis accelerates structural change in the world of work
            • How can we strengthen the contributory logic of work?
        • Events
        • Network
      • Blankensee-Colloquien
      • Anna Krüger Stiftung
      • Some Institutes for Advanced Study (SIAS)
      • Ukraine Fellowships
      • Elkana Fellowships
    • Bibliothek
      • Bestellen & Ausleihen
      • Recherche
        • Zeitschriften
        • Kataloge
        • Fachinformationsdienste
        • Archive
      • Bücher & Musik vor Ort
      • Fragen?
  • Fellows
    • Fellowfinder
    • Fellows 2022/2023
    • Permanent Fellows
      • Frühere Permanent Fellows
    • Alumni
      • Fellowclub
        • Verein
          • Geschichte
        • Mitgliedschaft
        • Newsletter
          • Februar 2023
            • Editorial
            • Geschichtslehrer des Volkes
            • Krieg und Frieden. Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Ukraine
            • Frostig, beschämt, befreit
            • Musik eines Geflüchteten
            • Grußwort des Vorsitzenden
            • Save the dates – Fellowtreffen 2023
            • Mitgliedschaft im Fellowclub
            • Mitgliedsbeiträge und Spenden
            • Neue Publikationen in der Fellowbibliothek
            • Preise
            • Obituarium
          • März 2022
            • Editorial
            • Politik, Recht und Wissenschaft in Zeiten der Pandemie
            • Pandemics: The Maths, the Masks, the Madness
            • Roni Taharlev: Der Vorbote von Corona
            • Rachel Wheatley: Berlin mit Maske
            • Grußwort des Vorsitzenden
            • Save the dates – Fellowtreffen 2022
            • Mitgliedschaft im Fellowclub
            • Mitgliedsbeiträge und Spenden
            • Neue Publikationen in der Fellowbibliothek
            • Preise
            • Obituarium
          • Februar 2021
            • Editorial
            • Zwischen Eigenzeit und Interdisziplinarität
            • Sag's durch die Maske!
            • Was war und zu welchem Ende studiert man Trumpismus?
            • Als die Computer laufen lernten
            • Zum Abschied von Sonja Grund
            • Angelika Leuchter
            • Blog-Serie zur Wissenschaftsfreiheit
            • Save the dates – Fellowtreffen 2021 und 2022
            • Neue Publikationen in der Fellowbibliothek
            • Preise
            • Mitgliedschaft im Fellowclub
            • Obituarium
          • März 2020
            • Editorial
            • Verfassung als gewaltlose Revolution
            • Imre Kertész und die europäische Literatur der Gegenwart
            • Es sind die Verluste, welche die Polen umtreiben
            • Das Kolleg und der Osten – das New Europe College in Bukarest
            • Save the date - Fellowtreffen: Biodiversity: Conceptual Challenges in an Era of Rapid Change 11./12.Juni 2020
            • Neue Publikationen in der Fellowbibliothek
            • Preise
            • Mitgliedschaft im Fellowclub
            • Obituarium
          • March 2019
            • Editorial
            • Paintings for the Future
            • Landmark Papers Revisited
            • Working Futures
            • Society Benefits From Our Autonomy
            • Two Million Blossoms in a Jar
            • Save the Date - Meeting of the Fellows' Club: June 13-14, 2019
            • Lectures on Film
            • New Publications in the Fellows' Library
            • Preise
            • Join the Fellows' Club
            • Obituaries
          • März 2018
            • Editorial
            • A Good Bet: Five Years of the College for Life Sciences
            • Lectures on Film: Lisa Herzog
            • Return to Gdańsk
            • Sign the Gdansk Petition
            • Lecture Series: "Recht und Digitalisierung"
            • The Future of the Humboldt Forum: An Epiphany
            • (Almost) A Lifer
            • Late Checkout
            • Save the Date - Fellowtreffen
            • Preise
            • New Publications in the Fellows' Library
            • Obi­tu­a­ri­um
          • March 2017
            • Editorial
            • Luca Giuliani: Facets of Stephen
            • Berliner Abend 2017
            • Michael Jennions: Walking Berlin
            • Nostalgia
            • Prizes
          • June 2016
            • Editorial
            • Daniel M. Weary: Three days at Wiko to imagine a new world
            • Katharina Wiedemann: Travelling Lights
            • William Marx: The Rising of Kaspar Hauser
            • Luc Steels: Grunewaldkirche, Bach, and Passions
            • Nostalgia
          • June 2015
            • Editorial
            • Adam S. Wilkins: Humanities and Natural Sciences
            • Rob Page: The Decline of the Humanities?
            • Alfons Söllner: From "Exilforschung" to "Emigrationsforschung"? A Journey in Memory.
            • Susan Rose-Ackerman and Bruce Ackerman: Wiko Then and Now: 1991-1992 and 2014-2015
            • Daniel Schönpflug: Ins Grüne
          • December 2014
            • Editorial
            • Sebastian Conrad: Global History
            • Sahotra Sarkar, Chris Margules: Biodiversity group at the Kolleg
            • Reinhart Meyer-Kalkus: On Uwe Pörksen: Camelot im Grunewald. Szenen aus dem intellektuellen Leben der achtziger Jahre
            • Meredith Reiches: "Literary studies and biology: The Shakespeare-Workshops at the Kolleg 2012 and 2013"
            • Simon Teuscher: Workshop: Perspectives on Actors in Social History
            • Gebhard Kirchgässner: Workshop “The Economic Model of Human Behaviour”
            • Gerald Wilkinson: Workshop “Mind the Gap: Closing the Gulf between Genomic and Phenotypic Studies of Sexual Selection”
            • Sonja Grund: News from the Fellows’ Club
          • May 2014
            • Editorial
            • Peter Reill: From the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin to Wiko: Reflections on a Return after Twenty-Seven Years
            • Reinhart Meyer-Kalkus:Why artists are needed at research institutions
            • Martin Loughlin: Constitutions beyond the Nation-State
            • Franco Moretti: Invisible objects
            • Stefanie Rentsch: The Forum Transregionale Studien – its Mission and History
          • November 2013
            • Editorial
            • Jim Hunt: Ten Years in the Rearview Mirror
            • Thorsten Wilhelmy: My First Year at the Wissenschaftskolleg
            • Giovanni Frazzetto: The College for Life Sciences at the Wissenschaftskolleg
            • Reinhart Meyer-Kalkus: The Fellow Forum for Former Fellows
      • Fellow Forum
  • Veranstaltungen
    • Veranstaltungskalender
    • Gesprächskonzerte
    • Zur Zeit
    • Observatorium
    • Ernst Mayr Lecture
    • Workshops
    • Three Cultures Forum
  • Wikothek
    • Wiko Shorts
    • Lectures & Keynotes
    • Features
    • Köpfe und Ideen
    • Arbeitsvorhaben
    • Jahrbuch
    • Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte
  • Fellow werden
    • Fellowships
      • Individuelle Fellowships
        • Voraussetzungen
        • Auswahlkriterien
        • Auswahlverfahren
        • FAQ
        • Bewerbungsplattform
      • Schwerpunktgruppen
        • Voraussetzungen
        • Kriterien
        • Verfahren
          • Befangenheit im Auswahlprozess
        • Übersicht über Schwerpunktgruppen
        • Aktuelle Ausschreibung
          • Hinweise zur Antragstellung
      • College for Life Sciences
        • Program
        • Application
        • Fellows
        • Scientific Committee
        • FAQ
    • Leben und Arbeiten
      • Finanzielle Regelungen
      • Wohnungen
      • Wissenschaftliches Leben
      • Dienste für Fellows
      • Dienste für Partnerinnen/Partner und Familien
Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin
DeutschEnglish
 Login


MENU

  • Institution
  • Fellows
  • Veranstaltungen
  • Wikothek
  • Fellow werden

  • Leitung
  • Gremien
  • Ansprechpartner
  • Das Kolleg
  • Initiativen & Kooperationen
  • Bibliothek

  • Working Futures
  • Blankensee-Colloquien
  • Anna Krüger Stiftung
  • Some Institutes for Advanced Study (SIAS)
  • Ukraine Fellowships
  • Elkana Fellowships

© privat

Blurring the Boundaries:
The future of work between self-employment and wage labour

Interview with Sophie Bernard

Sophie Bernard is Professor of Sociology at the Université Paris Dauphine and in 2020/2021 a Fellow at the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin. Her research focuses on the sociology of work and employment with a particular interest in the topics of the porosity between self-employment and wage labour, as well as platform capitalism and platform work. Her latest researchexamines the working conditions of Uber drivers in France, the United Kingdom, and Canada as representatives of a new business model based on digital platforms that act as intermediaries between customers and service providers. In this interview, we discuss with Sophie Bernard the role of platforms for the future of work.

Interview conducted by Katrin Sold

Interviewer: Your recent research on platform capitalism focuses on the situation of Uber drivers. Why did you choose this topic and how is your study designed?

SB: In the public debate, but also in the academic field, we have many discussions about the deployment of digital platforms and their impact on the world of work, but they remain very abstract. The deployment of digital platforms is contributing to a blurring of the boundary between self-employment and salaried work. In my study, I propose to approach this question from a sociological point of view to empirically describe the reality of the working and employment conditions of platform workers. I chose to focus on Uber drivers because they are emblematic of platform capitalism.

My investigation began by observing numerous Uber driver mobilizations in France, completed by interviews with drivers mobilized in the movement. I then conducted long interviews with drivers during rides in Paris, London, and Montreal. 

Interviewer: What are the working conditions of these drivers?

SB: In the beginning, working with Uber was a lucrative job. As remuneration was high, many drivers became success stories and convinced their relatives to join the platform. Indeed, Uber offered bonuses to encourage drivers to use the platform. The platform promised to the drivers also the possibility to organise working time freely and to conciliate the job with other activities and especially with family life.

Over the last years, however, we could observe a sharp deterioration of the drivers’ situation with a general decrease in the level of remuneration. Bonuses have been removed, rates decreased, and the commission taken by Uber increased. The drop in remuneration intensified the competition among the drivers and forced them to work more and more in order to maintain their level of income. There are specific periods during the day when Uber increases the rate (surges) in order to attract drivers, otherwise they do not have enough drivers in a specific area. These periods are early in the morning, during the night, and weekends. Many drivers have to work during these periods to earn enough money. The promise of compatibility of the job with family life and other jobs is thus becoming more and more obsolete.

Interviewer: Considering these difficult working conditions, what motivates workers to engage in this kind of platform job?

SB: There are three profiles of workers among Uber drivers. First, those for whom it is a supplementary activity and who have another main job that they supplement by being a driver in the evening and at the weekends. They, in general, are satisfied, because it is a side activity. At the same time, this type of driver is risky for the others, because they accept the working conditions imposed by the platform. Second, you have drivers for whom it is a temporary activity. It is their main activity, but they consider it temporary. In Montreal, for example, many immigrated people work as drivers while they are learning French, but they do not plan to work as drivers in the future. That’s why they usually do not question the working conditions. The third group of drivers, for whom working as a driver is their main activity in the long run, is divided. There are drivers who use the platform as a supplement to private rides. That is mostly the case in France. They have managed to establish a private clientele paying higher rates, and Uber is only a supplement. They are not really dependent on the platform and can accept the working conditions more easily. The situation is most difficult for the second part of this group, who work exclusively through the platform. Today, they form the majority of Uber drivers. In these cases, the platform determines their working conditions. These drivers mainly come from an immigrant working class background and have experienced unemployment and precarious jobs with even more difficult working conditions. Being their own boss via platform work gives them a sense of freedom. In comparison with their past professional trajectory, they consider working for Uber a “good bad job” (Rosenblat, 2018). Uber thus has a docile workforce on which it can impose constraints through a new form of control, “algorithmic management”.

Interviewer: Can we consider platform workers to be independent workers?

SB: Drivers join because they hope to be independent workers, organising their work and their working time independently. Over time, however, they understand that their activity is strongly supervised and controlled by the platform. They sign a charta that imposes the conditions of their work, and Uber imposes sanctions on the drivers if they do not fulfil it. The control of the charta, in fact, is delegated to the customers, because at the end of the ride, customers rate the drivers and give them between one and five stars. And if the average is too low, the account of the driver will be suspended or definitely deactivated. The same happens if the rate of acceptance of trips is less than 80 per cent or the rate of cancellation of trips more than 4 per cent. Drivers therefore assume the risks of the market, but do not enjoy the autonomy associated with self-employed status, nor the rights and protections associated with employee status. Many observers consider platform capitalism the end of wage employment and a push for independent work. But my survey shows that Uber drivers can be considered neither independent workers nor wage employees, but rather, hybrid workers who belong to the growing grey zone between salaried and independent employment.

Interviewer: What reactions to this dynamic could you observe?

I observed a significant collective mobilisation of Uber drivers in France. The protest started when Uber decided to decrease the rate by 20 per cent. The main demands are about remuneration and about concrete regulations for the sector dealing with the grey zone between salaried work and self-employment.

Negotiations on this question take place mainly in the legal arena and in the field of legislative regulations. In France, there was the idea to create, like in the UK, an intermediary category of workers between salaried work and self-employment that would have less protection than employees, but more than the self-employed. But this proposal met with strong opposition. Legal experts saw the risk that in the end this intermediary category could integrate the majority of workers. This would lead to a general reduction of workers’ rights and protections. For this reason this option has been rejected in France.

For the future, it could be a solution to make wage employment more attractive. Uber drivers often consider wage employment to be hierarchic and full of constraints. On the one hand, they want the protections and the rights of salaried employment, but on the other, they ask for more flexibility and autonomy. This could be an opportunity to demonstrate that salaried employment is not incompatible with autonomy. This form of “salaried employment with autonomy” already exists, for example in certain fields of white collar employment. But by blurring the lines between self- and salaried employment, platform capitalism requires us to think anew how to combine autonomy and security at work.  


Reference
Rosenblat, Alex: Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work, University of California, 2018.

  • Interviews
    • Gabriel Abend
    • Ève Chiapello
    • Elena Esposito
    • Michel Lallement
    • Sophie Bernard
    • David Stark
    • Richard Swedberg
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Network

Institute for Advanced Study

  • Twitter
  • Pressenotizen
  • Ansprechpartner
  • Kontakt
  • Vakanzen
  • Impressum
  • Datenschutz
  • Sitemap

Institution

  • Leitung
  • Gremien
  • Ansprechpartner
  • Das Kolleg
  • Initiativen & Kooperationen
  • Bibliothek

Fellows

  • Fellowfinder
  • Fellows 2022/2023
  • Permanent Fellows
  • Alumni

Veranstaltungen

  • Veranstaltungskalender
  • Gesprächskonzerte
  • Zur Zeit
  • Observatorium
  • Ernst Mayr Lecture
  • Workshops
  • Three Cultures Forum

Wikothek

  • Wiko Shorts
  • Lectures & Keynotes
  • Features
  • Köpfe und Ideen
  • Arbeitsvorhaben
  • Jahrbuch
  • Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte

Fellow werden

  • Fellowships
  • Leben und Arbeiten