Michael Taborsky, Dr. phil. nat.

Arbeitsvorhaben

The Evolution of Societies

Societies predominate in life on earth. This can be illustrated, for instance, by comparing the biomass of different species of animals, with ants, termites, and humans seeming to win the race, featuring arguably the most highly organized societies we know. These enormously successful societies are characterised by well-regulated social interactions, enhanced degrees of cooperation and altruism, differentiation among group members, and highly developed division of labour. But what makes them thrive? What renders them stable? Which evolutionary forces shape societies, and which behavioural attributes and interactions are associated with complex social organisations?
Social organisation in nature shows a great variety of forms, ranging from loose aggregations of anonymous units all the way up to highly organised societies. The aim of this project is to pinpoint the common principles responsible for the evolution of these different forms of social organisation and the environmental and intrinsic properties underlying the established diversity.
Societies consist of individuals basically serving as independent units of selection. As survival and reproduction require resources and only fiction knows a land of milk and honey, different individuals inevitably compete due to their own diverging fitness interests. The crucial question is how the conflict of fitness interests can be mediated in order to allow competitors for resources to unite and benefit from collective goal pursuit.
Central building blocks of stable societies include the exchange of information between the respective units. Interactions between the members of societies involve the release and perception of cues and signals using various sensory modalities and behavioural actions and reactions yielding corresponding fitness consequences. Natural selection acts on the “decision rules” governing responses to information obtained from the social environment within specific contextual frameworks.

Recommended Reading

Taborsky, Michael, Joachim G. Frommen, and Christina Riehl (2016). “Correlated Pay-Offs Are Key to Cooperation.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 371: 20150084. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0084.
Taborsky, Michael, Michael A. Cant, and Jan Komdeur (2021). The Evolution of Social Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garcia-Ruiz, Irene, Andrés Quiñones, and Michael Taborsky (2022). “The Evolution of Cooperative Breeding by Direct and Indirect Fitness Effects.” Science Advances 8, no. 21: eabl7853. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl7853.

Kolloquium, 22.11.2022

Die Evolution des Sozialverhaltens

Sozialverhalten und die Organisation von Gesellschaften sind in der Natur äußerst mannigfaltig. Wie lässt sich diese enorme Diversität im Lichte der natürlichen Selektion erklären? Ich werde Prinzipien vorstellen, die der Evolution des Sozialverhaltens in all ihren unterschiedlichen Ausprägungen zugrunde liegen.

Die Welt dreht sich um die Konkurrenz um Ressourcen. Organismen jeglicher Art konkurrieren um die Verfügbarkeit der Mittel, die ihnen erlauben, zu überleben und sich fortzupflanzen. Es gibt kein Schlaraffenland. Im Wettbewerb um notwendige Ressourcen haben diejenigen die Oberhand, die entweder schneller sind als die anderen, die sich im Wettstreit besser durchsetzen können, oder die es verstehen, mit anderen zusammenzuarbeiten und das Erlangte zu teilen. Ich möchte aufzeigen, welche Umweltbedingungen und inhärenten Merkmale die eine oder andere Vorgehensweise nahelegen. Dabei richte ich mein Augenmerk hauptsächlich auf die Evolutionsmechanismen, die der Kooperation zwischen Artgenossen zugrunde liegen. Die Kernfrage ist hierbei, wodurch erreicht wird, dass sich trotz immanenter Asymmetrien und im Widerstreit stehender „Fitnessinteressen“ die Mitglieder einer Gesellschaft zusammentun, um gemeinsam ein Ziel zu erreichen.

Publikationen aus der Fellowbibliothek

Taborsky, Michael (Oxford [u.a.] Wiley, 2024)

Ambrosia beetles adjust dispersal preferences to their degree of exhaustion

Taborsky, Michael (Amsterdam [u.a.], 2024)

Nepotism mediates enforced cooperation in asymmetric negotiations

Taborsky, Michael (Amsterdam [u.a.], 2024)

Norway rats recruit cooperation partners based on previous receipt of help while disregarding kinship

Taborsky, Michael (Oxford, 2023)

Reciprocal altruism in Norway rats

Taborsky, Michael (London, 2023)

Assessment of help value affects reciprocation in Norway rats

Taborsky, Michael (Bern, 2023)

Fit dank Freunden : wer kooperiert, profitiert

Taborsky, Michael (Washington, DC [u.a.], 2023)

Philopatry yields higher fitness than dispersal in a cooperative breeder with sex-specific life history trajectories

Taborsky, Michael (Berlin, 2023)

When deciding to cooperate by direct reciprocity, Norway rats sometimes benefit from olfactory competence and seem not impaired by insufficient cognitive abilities

Taborsky, Michael (Oxford, 2023)

Coercion promotes alloparental care in cooperative breeders

Taborsky, Michael (Oxford, 2023)

Genomic basis of Y-linked dwarfism in cichlids pursuing alternative reproductive tactics