• Institute
    • Leadership
    • Committees
      • Academic Advisory Board
        • Members' List since 1981
      • Board of Trustees
      • Members' Assembly
    • Contact Persons
    • The Kolleg
      • History
        • History of the Institute
          • History of the Kolleg
        • History of the Buildings and Gardens
          • Hauptgebäude
            • Excursus - Villa Linde's Grounds
          • Weiße Villa
          • Neubau
          • Villa Jaffé
          • Villa Walther
        • History of the Signet
      • Funding & Charters
        • Foundation Deed of the Ernst Reuter Foundation for Advanced Study
        • Charter of the Wissenschaftskolleg
      • Donors & Friends
    • Initiatives & Cooperations
      • Working Futures
        • Interviews
          • Gabriel Abend
          • Ève Chiapello
          • Elena Esposito
          • Michel Lallement
          • Sophie Bernard
          • David Stark
          • Richard Swedberg
        • Publications
          • Shifting Categories
          • Wiko Briefs - Working Futures in Corona Times
            • The digital transformation of work. COVID-19 as a taste of things to come?
            • Thinking the Global Rise of Forced Labor: Old, New, and Changing Forms of Labor Exploitation in Times of Crisis
            • Rearticulating globalization, solidarities, and work in Ethiopia
            • The future of shopping - Corona as a catalyst for the transformation of work
            • The End of the Pandemic of Productivism?
            • Covid and Looking for the Exit
            • Who or what is being tested in pandemic times?
            • The Crisis as Beginning of a New Relationship to the Professional World?
            • Controlled Avalanche – A Regulated Voluntary Exposure Approach for Addressing Covid-19
            • Caring about what we hold dear and the final purposes of work
            • How does the Corona crisis affect the future of work and our view of it?
            • "Useful", "indispensable", “essential”: Is the health crisis changing the categories with which we consider professional activities?
            • The Corona Crisis Reveals the Struggle for a Sustainable Digital Future
            • The Need for De-Integration in Pandemic Times
            • The COVID 19 crisis accelerates structural change in the world of work
            • How can we strengthen the contributory logic of work?
        • Events
        • Network
      • Blankensee-Colloquia
      • Anna Krüger Foundation
      • Some Institutes for Advanced Study (SIAS)
      • Support for Ukraine
      • VUIAS
        • Bilder der Eröffnungsfeier
      • Elkana Fellowships
    • Library
      • Ordering and Borrowing
      • Research
        • Journals and Newspapers
        • Catalogs
        • Specialised Information Services (Fachinformationsdienste)
        • Archives
      • Books & Music on-site
      • Questions?
  • Fellows
    • Fellow Finder
    • Fellows 2024/2025
    • Permanent Fellows
      • Former Permanent Fellows
    • Alumni
      • Fellows' Club
        • Club
          • History
        • Membership
        • Newsletter
          • March 2025
            • Editorial
            • Architecture of Survival: An Interview with Natalia Romik (Elkana Fellow 2024/2025)
            • “Definitions Are Not Ultimate Truths”
            • Further Videos in the Wikotheque
            • The School of Human Rights Association: Building an Egalitarian and Democratic Academia in Turkey
            • Academic Freedom on a Small Scale
            • Save the Date: Annual Meeting of the Fellows’ Club
            • Join the Fellows’ Club
            • Membership Fee and Donations
            • New Publications in the Fellows’ Library
            • Prizes
            • Obituaries
          • February 2024
            • Editorial
            • Feeding the World with Edible Insects
            • Schöner Leben
            • Further Videos in the Wikotheque
            • Conversation with a Left-Handed Hairdresser: The Cutting-Edge Sociology of Barbara Thériault (Fellow 2023/24)
            • Dishes that Raise Questions: Interview with chef de cuisine Sonja Frühsammer
            • Round and round the Grunewald Lake: Five Years of Wicked Wiko Runners
            • Save the Date – Meeting of the Fellows’ Club 2024
            • Join the Fellows’ Club
            • Membership Fee and Donations
            • New Publications in the Fellows’ Library
            • Prizes
            • Obituaries
          • February 2023
            • Editorial
            • History Teacher of the People
            • War and Peace. The Past and Future of Ukraine
            • Cold, Ashamed, Relieved: On Leaving Russia
            • Music of a Refugee
            • A Word from the Chairman
            • Save the dates – Meeting of the Fellows’ Club 2023
            • Join the Fellows’ Club
            • Membership Fee and Donations
            • New Publications in the Fellows’ Library
            • Prizes
            • Obituaries
          • March 2022
            • Editorial
            • Politics, Law, and Science in Times of the Pandemic
            • Pandemics: The Maths, the Masks, the Madness
            • Roni Taharlev: The Harbinger of Corona
            • Rachel Wheatley: Berlin with a Mask
            • A Word from the Chairman
            • Save the dates – Meeting of the Fellows’ Club 2022
            • Join the Fellows’ Club
            • Membership Fee and Donations
            • New Publications in the Fellows’ Library
            • Prizes
            • Obituaries
          • February 2021
            • Editorial
            • Between Eigenzeit and Interdisciplinarity
            • The Masked Kolleg Unmasked
            • Was war und zu welchem Ende studiert man Trumpismus?
            • When Computers Took Their First Steps
            • A Farewell to Sonja Grund
            • Angelika Leuchter
            • Blog Series on Academic Freedom
            • Save the dates – Meetings of the Fellows’ Club 2021 and 2022
            • New Publications in the Fellows’ Library
            • Prizes
            • Join the Fellows’ Club!
            • Obituaries
          • March 2020
            • Editorial
            • Constitution as Nonviolent Revolution
            • Imre Kertész und die europäische Literatur der Gegenwart
            • A Profound Sense of Loss
            • The Wissenschaftskolleg and the East: The New Europe College in Bucharest
            • Save the date - Meeting of the Fellows’ Club - Biodiversity: Conceptual Challenges in an Era of Rapid Change, June 11 and 12, 2020
            • New Publications in the Fellows’ Library
            • Prizes
            • Join the Fellows’ Club
            • Obituarium
          • March 2019
            • Editorial
            • Paintings for the Future
            • Landmark Papers Revisited
            • Working Futures
            • Society Benefits From Our Autonomy
            • Two Million Blossoms in a Jar
            • Save the Date - Meeting of the Fellows' Club: June 13-14, 2019
            • Lectures on Film
            • New Publications in the Fellows' Library
            • Prizes
            • Join the Fellows' Club
            • Obituaries
          • March 2018
            • Editorial
            • A Good Bet: Five Years of the College for Life Sciences
            • Lectures on Film: Lisa Herzog
            • Return to Gdańsk
            • Sign the Gdansk Petition
            • Lecture Series: "Recht und Digitalisierung"
            • The Future of the Humboldt Forum: An Epiphany
            • (Almost) A Lifer
            • Late Checkout
            • Save the Date - Fellowtreffen
            • Prizes
            • New Publications in the Fellows' Library
            • Obi­tu­a­ri­um
          • March 2017
            • Editorial
            • Luca Giuliani: Facets of Stephen
            • Berliner Abend 2017
            • Michael Jennions: Walking Berlin
            • Nostalgia
            • Prizes
          • June 2016
            • Editorial
            • Daniel M. Weary: Three days at Wiko to imagine a new world
            • Katharina Wiedemann: Travelling Lights
            • Wiliam Marx (fr)
            • Luc Steels: Grunewaldkirche, Bach, and Passions
            • Nostalgia
          • June 2015
            • Editorial
            • Adam S. Wilkins: Humanities and Natural Sciences
            • Rob Page: The Decline of the Humanities?
            • Alfons Söllner: From "Exilforschung" to "Emigrationsforschung"? A Journey in Memory.
            • Susan Rose-Ackerman and Bruce Ackerman: Wiko Then and Now: 1991-1992 and 2014-2015
            • Daniel Schönpflug: Ins Grüne
          • December 2014
            • Editorial
            • Sebastian Conrad: Global History
            • Sahotra Sarkar, Chris Margules: Biodiversity group at the Kolleg
            • Reinhart Meyer-Kalkus: On Uwe Pörksen: Camelot im Grunewald. Szenen aus dem intellektuellen Leben der achtziger Jahre
            • Meredith Reiches: "Literary studies and biology: The Shakespeare-Workshops at the Kolleg 2012 and 2013"
            • Simon Teuscher: Workshop: Perspectives on Actors in Social History
            • Gebhard Kirchgässner: Workshop “The Economic Model of Human Behaviour”
            • Gerald Wilkinson: Workshop “Mind the Gap: Closing the Gulf between Genomic and Phenotypic Studies of Sexual Selection”
            • Sonja Grund: News from the Fellows’ Club
          • May 2014
            • Editorial
            • Peter Reill: From the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin to Wiko: Reflections on a Return after Twenty-Seven Years
            • Reinhart Meyer-Kalkus:Why artists are needed at research institutions
            • Martin Loughlin: Constitutions beyond the Nation-State
            • Franco Moretti: Invisible objects
            • Stefanie Rentsch: The Forum Transregionale Studien – its Mission and History
          • November 2013
            • Editorial
            • Jim Hunt: Ten Years in the Rearview Mirror
            • Thorsten Wilhelmy: My First Year at the Wissenschaftskolleg
            • Giovanni Frazzetto: The College for Life Sciences at the Wissenschaftskolleg
            • Reinhart Meyer-Kalkus: The Fellow Forum for Former Fellows
      • Fellow Forum
  • Events
    • Calendar of Events
    • Workshops
    • Series of Events
      • Lecture Recitals
      • Zur Zeit
      • Observatorium
      • Ernst Mayr Lecture
    • Three Cultures Forum
  • Wikotheque
    • Wiko Shorts
    • Lectures & Keynotes
    • Features
    • Köpfe und Ideen
    • Projects
    • Yearbook
    • Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte
  • Becoming a Fellow
    • Individual Fellowships
    • College for Life Sciences
      • Program
      • Application
      • Fellows
      • Scientific Committee
      • FAQ
    • Living and Working
      • Financial Arrangements
      • Housing
      • Academic Life
      • Services
      • Services for Partners and Families
image/svg+xml
DeutschEnglish
 Login


MENU

  • Institute
  • Fellows
  • Events
  • Wikotheque
  • Becoming a Fellow

  • Wiko Shorts
  • Lectures & Keynotes
  • Features
  • Köpfe und Ideen
  • Projects
  • Yearbook
  • Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte

Köpfe und Ideen 2016

Issue 11 / March 2016

More Than a Job

Ralph Bollmann

Bénédicte Zimmermann, Permanent Fellow at the Wissenschaftskolleg, is researching the transformation of work in its historical and transnational dimensions. This opens up unusual perspectives onto a number of current issues

For most people work takes up a large part of their lives. Nonetheless “work” as a subject of research fell out of fashion for some time. This was fundamentally changed by the swift economic changes that the world has been experiencing in recent years and is why there has been so much demand for the expertise of the French sociologist and historian Bénédicte Zimmermann, who has long been preoccupied with the theme. As early as 1996 she had written her doctoral dissertation on the history of unemployment in Germany. Together with her French colleague Michael Werner she developed the concept of a German-French histoire croisée – of an intertwined history of the two nations. Since 2007 she has been Directrice d’études at the École des hautes études en sciences sociales in Paris, and since 2015 she has also assumed the position of Permanent Fellow at the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin. In this interview she takes stock of her research and speaks of future projects.

Ralph Bollmann: Your most recent book bears the title What Working Means. That is truly a question of great magnitude. Is there even an answer to such a question?  

Bénédicte Zimmermann: There is no single conclusive answer – and today less so than ever. The question can be posed, at the very least, at three different levels. What does work mean in a certain society, in a certain enterprise, and for individual persons? It is mostly the first or second level which is addressed. But of particular importance to me is how these three levels cohere. This requires that one apprehend just how individuals fabricate meaning in their lives and the manifold nature of such.     

RB: Is work really a matter of meaning? Or is it simply about earning money? 

BZ: It’s paradoxical. Someone who has no occupation and is in search of work sees it first and foremost as a way of making a living. But for people who earn a lot of money, this money is typically not the most important thing for them. They are in search of self-realization. What does work mean for an individual at a certain point in his or her life and what is the economic, financial and human purpose of work seen from the standpoint of society as a whole? There is no conclusive answer to these questions. The values and aims which humans connect with work can be very contrasting.

RB: What role does social recognition play? 

BZ: A large one. And not only on the symbolic level but in a very concrete fashion. So as to be a beneficiary of social insurance in France and Germany, one must first be employed. Someone who is without work is dependent on poor relief and then later receives no pension. And in social representations the person receiving poor relief is deemed a citizen of the second order. 

RB: Today we regard it as self-evident that work should play a central role in our lives. Pre-modern societies had another view of matters. Aristotle was even of the opinion that an individual could only live a truly free life if he had no need to work.    

BZ: You’re right – that fundamentally changed in the modern era. In earlier centuries one’s standing in European societies was based on other assets, above all on one’s family origins and landholding. Today it is a matter of social property – which is created by work. This also holds in part for the elites. Social and political integration is closely linked with work in terms of our social image.

RB: Haven’t human beings always worked?

BZ: To some extent this has been an anthropological constant. But in the twentieth century we have privileged a certain form and meaning of work through wage labor. Today with digital capitalism the meaning of work is changing again. There is enormous pressure for greater autonomy in work and the working life. This pressure has both economic and social causes, which yield extremely dichotomous consequences.  

RB: Don’t the new forms of work create new freedoms for those working in these areas?

BZ: Perhaps one can create something good from it. But the discourse of personal responsibility that is linked to the discourse on freedom is questionable. Often this places too great demands on individual potential. And not everyone has the necessary resources at their disposal. Being responsible entails not only individual resources but collective ones (and organizational ones as well if we take enterprises into account) and to which not everyone has the same access. How can responsibility for work quality be assigned to the worker when he is not equipped with the necessary technical, material and temporal means to achieve those objectives with which he has been entrusted? This even applies to managers when they don’t have sufficient personnel to properly complete their business objectives.

RB: The concept of unemployment is linked to the notion of wage labor. In the German language, as you have shown, the word Arbeitslosigkeit first emerged some hundred years ago. Why so late? 

BZ: The French word for unemployment recalls the old conditions – chômage comes from chaumes, which are bales of straw that dried in the fields during summer. It was during this period of burning sun that the peasants had less to do. These forms of non-work were quite common in the pre-modern era. But that was something fundamentally different from our concept of unemployment which is closely linked to the notion of wage labor.

RB: What changed?

BZ: With industrialization people came to the cities and peasants became employees. They could no longer produce their own food. This created a new form of dependence not only from a legal standpoint with respect to their employer but economically speaking. And it generated a new social problem – whenever there was a lack of work the number of poor and hungry people grew through the number of workers who became unemployed. So as to grapple with this problem, in Imperial Germany the broad category of “poverty” was divided into subcategories according to the cause of that poverty. And under Bismarck the social insurance legislation was passed. It targeted those causes of poverty for which the workers were not held responsible. 

RB: Unemployment insurance was first introduced into Germany in 1927 – why not earlier?

BZ: Because the issue of guilt was such a contentious one. It was a fairly clear matter when someone lost his arm at work. But when someone lost his job for economic reasons and the boss said he was lazy or behaved improperly then who was to be believed? It was only in the Weimar Republic that this issue was finally resolved. After the workers had fought in the First World War they became citizens like everyone else. These days the question of guilt and the suspicion that whoever has no work has no desire to work, is returning.

RB: In your research you deal with various countries, primarily Germany and France. What can be learned from this comparative international perspective? 

BZ: If against growing resistance we wish to keep on building Europe then we require a new vantage point. It is insufficient to analyze only the differences or observe the reciprocal transfers. We must instead direct our gaze to those close interweavings for which my colleague Michael Werner and I have coined the phrase histoire croisée – intertwined history.  

RB: Is this a return to those classic sociologists who still thought in historical terms? 

BZ: Much of this is indirectly suggested by Georg Simmel. He regards society not only as a totality or from the standpoint of individuals but in their interaction with one another. He brings humans in relation to one another. And in his philosophy of money he seizes on the question of meaning. What is of value to humans? This cannot take the form of a decree from above. It is a matter of what the people themselves feel.     

RB: One would imagine that in this age of globalization the notion of work in the various countries is becoming increasingly similar. Is this in fact the case?

BZ: There are still great differences. They are not only of an economic but a cultural nature. A few years ago there was a large-scale investigation into the values of Europeans with respect to work. The finding was that nowhere in Europe did work enjoy such high status as among the French.    

RB: The cliché is that it is Germans who find work to be the most important thing.

BZ: Apparently not the case. At the same time the French lead the way in wanting to work less. At first glance that would seem like a paradox.  

RB: Do you have an explanation for it?

BZ: Work relations in France are hierarchical; there is great pressure on employees, resulting in a range of psycho-social diseases. There is really no such thing as democracy within the enterprise. This is not the case in Germany. Even if it is democracy of a limited sort. There is a common goal and everyone acts in concert so as to achieve this goal. In a crisis people will work a little less for a bit less money because they know that things will later improve. That is a difficult attitude to cultivate in France – there is such mistrust between employer and employee that solidarity within an enterprise is very hard to achieve.     

RB: At the Wissenschaftskolleg you want to grapple more intensively with this issue of work cultures. What exactly are your plans? 

BZ: We have chosen six firms from Germany and France that have sites in both countries. Here is what we want to examine: How does the business policy of multinational enterprises operate at local sites? What effect does it have on the work relations and occupational careers of the employees? What about the trust and mistrust to be found in the workplace? What are the consequences of digitalization for co-working and home-work as well as classic work organizations? What is the latitude and what are the constraints that emerge from it for the employees and the enterprise? I expect much to come of this.  

RB: The leading question of your research project is: “What kind of work for what kind of society?” What exactly does this mean and who decides such a question?

BZ: Because work is so important in the lives of most people, they should have a chance to voice their concerns and be heard. There remains much to do, in Germany as well. Work and politics are linked, but they are not necessarily thought of as interrelated. This linkage can be found at the micro-level of individuals as well as at the macro-level of political and economic organizations. These days multinational firms are extremely powerful. So long as they don’t take the political, social and ecological consequences of their economic decisions into account then very little will change. National political decisions are no longer sufficient in steering a society. The case of Greece is a paradigmatic example of this. 

RB: Proponents of an unconditional basic income assert that if no one is compelled to work for sheer sake of subsistence then employees can determine their work conditions themselves. Do you believe in this?

BZ: No. If we say that work is a part of being human then we can’t exclude a portion of society from it. The danger would be instituting a two-class society – people with a mere basic income – and then the rest. If Simmel is right that power and its exercise is another anthropological constant of humanity then it is difficult to believe that a basic income by itself can solve all of society’s problems. Perhaps in connection with other measures. These are still to be devised and certainly not only at the national level. The close coupling of economics and politics creates a transnational challenge. 

RB: What do you propose instead? More political regulation?

BZ: It is not a matter of regulating work from above but bringing democracy to the workplace. This does not contradict the transnational challenges. Human life plays out on a variety of levels at one and the same time. Individual workers should be able to have a say regarding the purpose of their work and how it ought to be organized – of course always with respect to success of the enterprise. It is not only a matter of working hours and conditions but the organization of work and the question as to what being successful actually means for a company. What are the yardsticks against which success should be measured? Only financial ones or human as well? We are experiencing a revolution in working conditions. The traditional rules no longer apply. The sole question is what will come next. If we regard work not only as a means but a constitutive dimension of society then not only managers and shareholders should be included in the decision-making process. The contributions of labor unions are insufficient here. The integration of individual voices and collective bargaining needs to be rethought – just as at the other end of things the interplay between national and transnational politics must be reconceived. 

RB: There is presently a debate about whether computers and robots will someday perform the majority of jobs. Will we soon run out of work?

BZ: I don’t believe at all in this thesis. For me it is a matter of newly configuring and defining work, for example including family or volunteer work under the rubric. There will be new job descriptions with new qualifications. Work will change. A new balance between paid and unpaid work may arise. But we will not run out of it.

More on: Bénédicte Zimmermann

Images: © Maurice Weiss

Institute for Advanced Study

  • Press Releases
  • Contact Persons
  • Contact
  • Vacancies
  • Legal Notice
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap

Institute

  • Leadership
  • Committees
  • Contact Persons
  • The Kolleg
  • Initiatives & Cooperations
  • Library

Fellows

  • Fellow Finder
  • Fellows 2024/2025
  • Permanent Fellows
  • Alumni

Events

  • Calendar of Events
  • Workshops
  • Series of Events
  • Three Cultures Forum

Wikotheque

  • Wiko Shorts
  • Lectures & Keynotes
  • Features
  • Köpfe und Ideen
  • Projects
  • Yearbook
  • Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte

Becoming a Fellow

  • Individual Fellowships
  • College for Life Sciences
  • Living and Working