• Institute
    • Leadership
    • Committees
      • Academic Advisory Board
        • Members' List since 1981
      • Board of Trustees
      • Members' Assembly
    • Contact Persons
    • The Kolleg
      • History
        • History of the Institute
          • History of the Kolleg
        • History of the Buildings and Gardens
          • Hauptgebäude
            • Excursus - Villa Linde's Grounds
          • Weiße Villa
          • Neubau
          • Villa Jaffé
          • Villa Walther
        • History of the Signet
      • Funding & Charters
        • Foundation Deed of the Ernst Reuter Foundation for Advanced Study
        • Charter of the Wissenschaftskolleg
      • Donors & Friends
    • Initiatives & Cooperations
      • Working Futures
        • Interviews
          • Gabriel Abend
          • Ève Chiapello
          • Elena Esposito
          • Michel Lallement
          • Sophie Bernard
          • David Stark
          • Richard Swedberg
        • Publications
          • Shifting Categories
          • Wiko Briefs - Working Futures in Corona Times
            • The digital transformation of work. COVID-19 as a taste of things to come?
            • Thinking the Global Rise of Forced Labor: Old, New, and Changing Forms of Labor Exploitation in Times of Crisis
            • Rearticulating globalization, solidarities, and work in Ethiopia
            • The future of shopping - Corona as a catalyst for the transformation of work
            • The End of the Pandemic of Productivism?
            • Covid and Looking for the Exit
            • Who or what is being tested in pandemic times?
            • The Crisis as Beginning of a New Relationship to the Professional World?
            • Controlled Avalanche – A Regulated Voluntary Exposure Approach for Addressing Covid-19
            • Caring about what we hold dear and the final purposes of work
            • How does the Corona crisis affect the future of work and our view of it?
            • "Useful", "indispensable", “essential”: Is the health crisis changing the categories with which we consider professional activities?
            • The Corona Crisis Reveals the Struggle for a Sustainable Digital Future
            • The Need for De-Integration in Pandemic Times
            • The COVID 19 crisis accelerates structural change in the world of work
            • How can we strengthen the contributory logic of work?
        • Events
        • Network
      • Blankensee-Colloquia
      • Anna Krüger Foundation
      • Some Institutes for Advanced Study (SIAS)
      • Ukraine Fellowships
      • Elkana Fellowships
    • Library
      • Ordering and Borrowing
      • Research
        • Journals and Newspapers
        • Catalogs
        • Specialised Information Services (Fachinformationsdienste)
        • Archives
      • Books & Music on-site
      • Questions?
  • Fellows
    • Fellowfinder
    • Fellows 2022/2023
    • Permanent Fellows
      • Former Permanent Fellows
    • Alumni
      • Fellows' Club
        • Club
          • History
        • Membership
        • Newsletter
          • March 2022
            • Editorial
            • Politics, Law, and Science in Times of the Pandemic
            • Pandemics: The Maths, the Masks, the Madness
            • Roni Taharlev: The Harbinger of Corona
            • Rachel Wheatley: Berlin with a Mask
            • A Word from the Chairman
            • Save the dates – Meeting of the Fellows’ Club 2022
            • Join the Fellows’ Club
            • Membership Fee and Donations
            • New Publications in the Fellows’ Library
            • Prizes
            • Obituaries
          • February 2021
            • Editorial
            • Between Eigenzeit and Interdisciplinarity
            • The Masked Kolleg Unmasked
            • Was war und zu welchem Ende studiert man Trumpismus?
            • When Computers Took Their First Steps
            • A Farewell to Sonja Grund
            • Angelika Leuchter
            • Blog Series on Academic Freedom
            • Save the dates – Meetings of the Fellows’ Club 2021 and 2022
            • New Publications in the Fellows’ Library
            • Prizes
            • Join the Fellows’ Club!
            • Obituaries
          • March 2020
            • Editorial
            • Constitution as Nonviolent Revolution
            • Imre Kertész und die europäische Literatur der Gegenwart
            • A Profound Sense of Loss
            • The Wissenschaftskolleg and the East: The New Europe College in Bucharest
            • Save the date - Meeting of the Fellows’ Club - Biodiversity: Conceptual Challenges in an Era of Rapid Change, June 11 and 12, 2020
            • New Publications in the Fellows’ Library
            • Prizes
            • Join the Fellows’ Club
            • Obituarium
          • March 2019
            • Editorial
            • Paintings for the Future
            • Landmark Papers Revisited
            • Working Futures
            • Society Benefits From Our Autonomy
            • Two Million Blossoms in a Jar
            • Save the Date - Meeting of the Fellows' Club: June 13-14, 2019
            • Lectures on Film
            • New Publications in the Fellows' Library
            • Prizes
            • Join the Fellows' Club
            • Obituaries
          • March 2018
            • Editorial
            • A Good Bet: Five Years of the College for Life Sciences
            • Lectures on Film: Lisa Herzog
            • Return to Gdańsk
            • Sign the Gdansk Petition
            • Lecture Series: "Recht und Digitalisierung"
            • The Future of the Humboldt Forum: An Epiphany
            • (Almost) A Lifer
            • Late Checkout
            • Save the Date - Fellowtreffen
            • Prizes
            • New Publications in the Fellows' Library
            • Obi­tu­a­ri­um
          • March 2017
            • Editorial
            • Luca Giuliani: Facets of Stephen
            • Berliner Abend 2017
            • Michael Jennions: Walking Berlin
            • Nostalgia
            • Prizes
          • June 2016
            • Editorial
            • Daniel M. Weary: Three days at Wiko to imagine a new world
            • Katharina Wiedemann: Travelling Lights
            • Wiliam Marx (fr)
            • Luc Steels: Grunewaldkirche, Bach, and Passions
            • Nostalgia
          • June 2015
            • Editorial
            • Adam S. Wilkins: Humanities and Natural Sciences
            • Rob Page: The Decline of the Humanities?
            • Alfons Söllner: From "Exilforschung" to "Emigrationsforschung"? A Journey in Memory.
            • Susan Rose-Ackerman and Bruce Ackerman: Wiko Then and Now: 1991-1992 and 2014-2015
            • Daniel Schönpflug: Ins Grüne
          • December 2014
            • Editorial
            • Sebastian Conrad: Global History
            • Sahotra Sarkar, Chris Margules: Biodiversity group at the Kolleg
            • Reinhart Meyer-Kalkus: On Uwe Pörksen: Camelot im Grunewald. Szenen aus dem intellektuellen Leben der achtziger Jahre
            • Meredith Reiches: "Literary studies and biology: The Shakespeare-Workshops at the Kolleg 2012 and 2013"
            • Simon Teuscher: Workshop: Perspectives on Actors in Social History
            • Gebhard Kirchgässner: Workshop “The Economic Model of Human Behaviour”
            • Gerald Wilkinson: Workshop “Mind the Gap: Closing the Gulf between Genomic and Phenotypic Studies of Sexual Selection”
            • Sonja Grund: News from the Fellows’ Club
          • May 2014
            • Editorial
            • Peter Reill: From the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin to Wiko: Reflections on a Return after Twenty-Seven Years
            • Reinhart Meyer-Kalkus:Why artists are needed at research institutions
            • Martin Loughlin: Constitutions beyond the Nation-State
            • Franco Moretti: Invisible objects
            • Stefanie Rentsch: The Forum Transregionale Studien – its Mission and History
          • November 2013
            • Editorial
            • Jim Hunt: Ten Years in the Rearview Mirror
            • Thorsten Wilhelmy: My First Year at the Wissenschaftskolleg
            • Giovanni Frazzetto: The College for Life Sciences at the Wissenschaftskolleg
            • Reinhart Meyer-Kalkus: The Fellow Forum for Former Fellows
      • Fellow Forum
  • Events
    • Calendar of Events
    • Lecture Recitals
    • Zur Zeit
    • Observatorium
    • Ernst Mayr Lecture
    • Workshops
    • Three Cultures Forum
  • Wikotheque
    • Wiko Shorts
    • Lectures on Film
    • Features
    • Köpfe und Ideen
    • Projects
    • Yearbook
    • Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte
  • Becoming a Fellow
    • Fellowships
      • Individual Fellowships
        • Preconditions
        • Selection Criteria
        • Selection Procedure
        • FAQ
        • Application Platform
      • Focus Groups
        • Preconditions
        • Criteria
        • Procedures
          • Befangenheit im Auswahlprozess
        • Overview of Focus Groups
      • College for Life Sciences
        • Program
        • Application
        • Fellows
        • Scientific Committee
        • FAQ
    • Living and Working
      • Financial Arrangements
      • Housing
      • Academic Life
      • Services
      • Services for Partners and Families
Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin
DeutschEnglish
 Login


MENU

  • Institute
  • Fellows
  • Events
  • Wikotheque
  • Becoming a Fellow

  • Fellowfinder
  • Fellows 2022/2023
  • Permanent Fellows
  • Alumni

  • Fellows' Club
  • Fellow Forum

New Rector Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger in an interview for the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung

German interview on faz.net

Society Benefits From Our Autonomy

An historian of early-modern Europe discusses havens of ratiocination and the politicization of historiography

FAZ: Ms. Stollberg-Rilinger, in September you became the Rector of the Wissenschaftskolleg. The Kolleg is a classic non-university Institute for Advanced Study that is self-administering and is likewise completely independent when it comes to selecting Fellows and its thematic emphases. Fellows perennially describe the Wissenschaftskolleg as a “refuge.” Does it in fact function as the perfect haven from the university?

Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger: It serves a complementary function to the university. The academic world has grown ever more stressful and is increasingly subject to the pressure of third-party-funded projects and excellence initiatives. You need a space where you can collect your wits. It’s true that Institutes for Advanced Study are increasing in number, in Germany as well, so one might think that the Wissenschaftskolleg has forfeited its unique selling point. But it hasn’t. For one thing it is much larger than all these other institutes, for another it is completely autonomous, and thirdly it’s a kind of boarding school for the highly gifted – which I guess makes me the head master (laughs).

An institute affording its Fellows maximum freedom to think and write in all serenity – at such a place what is the Rector’s job, what is there to actually do?

Right, that’s the big question (laughs). What makes the Wissenschaftskolleg so special is the College principle. For an entire year the Fellows basically live together. At absolute minimum they lunch or dine together, which for me is the crucial point because that’s where the actual interchange takes place. And someone must symbolically represent the whole. One of my central instrumental tasks – together with the advisory board – is to select the Fellows. That’s quite a challenge because you have to combine a number of different parameters. Ideally we should effect a certain gender symmetry, we should have a greater quantity of younger Fellows, and there should be some kind of balance among the various disciplines and regions of the world our Fellows call home.

The Wissenschaftskolleg is a very international institute. Has scientific research and other scholarly work meanwhile become quite similar worldwide, or do there still remain great cultural differences?

To my mind the larger difference is between the humanities and the natural sciences. Academics whether they come from Europe or Africa, are all beholden to a shared habitus. It might of course be the case that my impression is the product of our selection mechanisms and that here at the Wissenschaftskolleg we don’t even get a look at entirely different intellectual cultures. To be clear, we should by no means give in to those fundamental critiques of “Western” scientific thinking which are so fashionable at the moment. We have to hold on to certain academic principles and at the same time be aware that this might lead to problems, giving people from countries like the United States considerable advantages, who apply in far greater numbers anyway. Our concern is therefore to maintain highest intellectual standards and at the same time purposefully seek out qualified scholars from hitherto underrepresented regions.

Your last book was a biography of Empress Maria Theresa, which was a great success. Are you working on anything now?

I would like to write a book about a single historical episode that is illuminated from a multitude of perspectives. An example would be the destruction of Magdeburg in the Thirty Years’ War, which transpired within the space of a single day. There are a great many sources pertaining to that event, it triggered a huge response in the media of the day. For that very reason it has, however, been quite well researched. So I’m still not decided yet. I find such historical events interesting which allow for a wide variety of sources to speak at length. My main goal is to impart the strangeness of the epoch which I am examining. To this purpose you need to let the sources speak for themselves. My ideal is to take significant incidents in order to vividly convey analytic insights.

This September the Historikertag (Biennial Meeting of German Historians) in Münster chose as its theme “Divided Societies.” These divisions also affect historiography itself, which is under pressure in many countries. In Hungary, Poland, Russia and Turkey the scholarly disciplines are being politically instrumentalized or suppressed in the cause of national mythmaking. Hindu nationalism is now on the rise in India, scholarly standards are being massively discredited. Must the historical discipline take an intellectual stance?

That’s a real problem, especially here at the Wissenschaftskolleg, because we have a number of partner institutes in Eastern Europe. The institute in Budapest is presently being expelled from Hungary; the institute in Saint Petersburg could not even be developed beyond its preliminary stage. The institute in Bucharest is still uncontested, but nobody knows how the situation will develop there. Engagement on behalf of these institutes is a general concern of civil society. All of society profits from the autonomy of science and scholarship. In my view, however, the actual work of historians should be distinct from such civic engagement. Writing history adhering to historical-critical standards already means raising awareness.

By serving as a corrective to political mythmaking?

Yes. I’m well aware that in order for their books to have any resonance with the wider public, historians are always tempted to compose these grand narratives. For example a Viennese colleague, Wolfgang Schmale, has called upon historians to engage in countervailing the European “deficit of myth.” I have a great deal of sympathy for the European Union but don’t regard it as the historian’s task to promote mythmaking, howsoever well intentioned it might be.

In your research, your approach pertains strongly to functional differentiation, you examine the development of autonomous subsystems of society, for example of modern bureaucracy. These days we are experiencing the accession to power of autocrats and oversimplifiers. Is rollback being effected on the process of functional differentiation? Or is it, despite many signs of its disintegration, somehow still carrying forward?

Within the Cluster of Excellence Religion and Politics at the University of Münster, where I taught for many years, we had endless discussions about this. And to be perfectly frank, I just don’t know. At the moment it really looks as if the system boundaries between science and politics, for instance, might be severely compromised. The populist tendencies of our day do indeed amount to a kind of de-differentiation. On the other hand it could also be the case that highly differentiated societies have developed a certain resilience against such tendencies that will not make for any easy rollback. This is of course a somewhat optimistic assumption on my part.

What is the situation with Turkey where President Erdogan seizes all power for himself? Or China, ruled as it is from a strong power center and whose long-term planning can only be marveled at by Western states?

In Turkey at the moment we see that politics is rather powerless when running up against the inherent logic of the economy. Science and scholarship is of course much more vulnerable in this respect. In any event, as a historian, I would never dare to make long-term prognoses. From a historical standpoint, bold plans such as those conceived by the Chinese government have always proven to be phantasms of rationality.

Has the “cultural turn” caused historians to unfairly neglect social and economic themes as well as those pertaining to the history of science? Is too much being ascribed to culture these days?

My understanding of cultural history is not that it is limited to certain subjects but rather that it adopts a specific stance vis-à-vis all subjects. I would say that one always has to keep in mind the insights and principles of social history – just as one cannot ignore the insights of gender history. That by no means implies the exclusion of a culturalistic way of looking at things. Both transculturality and globalization research eventually lead back to social history. What I find to be problematic is that in many respects the cultural turn has led to a certain arbitrariness in the choice of subject. The label of “cultural history” can sometimes be a cover for some rather positivistic, antiquated love of detail, bereft of any analytic inquiry.

Would you say that today we are living through a new “saddle period” (“Sattelzeit”) – a major transformation of society - comparable with that from 1780 to 1830 when political thought and people’s experience of time changed profoundly?

Yes. Today we are experiencing a media revolution through digitalization that is comparable with the structural changes affecting the public sphere in the eighteenth century – or perhaps even more analogous to the sixteenth-century revolution in typography – as it concerns the structural ramifications in all fields of society. To cite just one random symptom, as recently described by DFG (German Research Foundation) president Peter Strohschneider, the American president’s constant Twitter actions are homologous to populist politics. This new mode of political communication suggests that people have direct access to the president; the virtual community of followers can feel like a true nation. Conversely the prerequisite for emergence of the liberal state under the rule of law is a certain historically evolved textual culture that for instance has enabled the distinction between reasoning deliberation and decision-making. Instead of argument-based discourse there is now the supposedly direct expression of agreement in a virtual national community. A certain style of digital communication and a populist political style serve to spur each other on.

The interview was conducted by Diba Shokri and Thomas Thiel and was published in German in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung on August 29, 2018.

  • Club
  • Membership
  • Newsletter
    • March 2022
    • February 2021
    • March 2020
    • March 2019
      • Editorial
      • Paintings for the Future
      • Landmark Papers Revisited
      • Working Futures
      • Society Benefits From Our Autonomy
      • Two Million Blossoms in a Jar
      • Save the Date - Meeting of the Fellows' Club: June 13-14, 2019
      • Lectures on Film
      • New Publications in the Fellows' Library
      • Prizes
      • Join the Fellows' Club
      • Obituaries
    • March 2018
    • March 2017
    • June 2016
    • June 2015
    • December 2014
    • May 2014
    • November 2013

Institute for Advanced Study

  • Twitter
  • Press Releases
  • Contact Persons
  • Contact
  • Vacancies
  • Legal Notice
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap

Institute

  • Leadership
  • Committees
  • Contact Persons
  • The Kolleg
  • Initiatives & Cooperations
  • Library

Fellows

  • Fellowfinder
  • Fellows 2022/2023
  • Permanent Fellows
  • Alumni

Events

  • Calendar of Events
  • Lecture Recitals
  • Zur Zeit
  • Observatorium
  • Ernst Mayr Lecture
  • Workshops
  • Three Cultures Forum

Wikotheque

  • Wiko Shorts
  • Lectures on Film
  • Features
  • Köpfe und Ideen
  • Projects
  • Yearbook
  • Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte

Becoming a Fellow

  • Fellowships
  • Living and Working