BEGIN:VCALENDAR
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
VERSION:2.0
X-WR-CALNAME: Fellows WWW
METHOD:PUBLISH

BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Berlin
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Berlin
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19700329T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19701025T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE


BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:5004ffda3c6243be8220eba6b73cbda0
LOCATION:Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin
SUMMARY:Reconciliation and the Role of the Judiciary: Imperialism, Constitutionalism, and the Question of Aboriginal Title
DESCRIPTION:Joshua Nichols - Canada's constitutional order rests on a legal rupture. Prior to Confederation, Indigenous peoples were treated as nations, allies, and treaty partners.  In the nineteenth century, however, that relationship began to change: Indigenous nations transformed from treaty partners into subjects of Crown jurisdiction.  How can the authority of the Canadian state be brought into a lawful relation with Indigenous peoples as partners in confederation?  In Canada, that task cannot be separated from the legacy of British and Canadian imperialism - not only did Canadian law often fail to recognize Aboriginal and treaty rights, but changes in nineteenth-century constitutional doctrine also helped make that failure appear lawful.  Joshua Nichols asks how constitutional reconciliation can be achieved and what it requires of the judiciary. In a historical survey of the jurisprudence, he shows that courts play a central role in identifying the imperial assumptions that remain embedded in constitutional law.  By removing them from doctrine, courts are helping restore legality to the Crown-Indigenous relationship.  Anmeldung unter rsvp(at)wiko-berlin.de oder telefonisch unter 030/89 00 1-0
CLASS:PUBLIC
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260601T190000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260601T210000
END:VEVENT

END:VCALENDAR